Tuesday, June 20, 2017

Corn Better Used as Food Not Biofuel

Corn is grown not only for food; it is also used as an important renewable energy source. But renewable biofuels can come with hidden economic and environmental issues.

The question of whether corn is better used as food or as biofuel has persisted since ethanol came into use. Now, for the first time, researchers have quantified and compared these issues in terms of the economics of the entire production system to determine if the benefits of biofuel corn outweigh the costs.

A harvester in a corn field, subject of research at NSF's Intensively Managed Landscapes CZO site.
Harvester in corn field
Credit: Praveen Kumar

Scientists Praveen Kumar and Meredith Richardson of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign published their findings this week in the American Geophysical Union journal Earth's Future.

The results show that using biofuel corn doesn't completely offset the environmental effects of producing that corn.

As part of a National Science Foundation (NSF) project to study the environmental effects of agriculture in the U.S., the Illinois researchers obtained a comprehensive view of agricultural ecosystems to analyze crops' effects on the environment in monetary terms.

The research was conducted as part of NSF's Intensively Managed Landscapes Critical Zone Observatory (CZO), one of a network of nine NSF CZOs across the country.

"The critical zone, where we focused our work, is the permeable layer of the landscape near the surface that stretches from the top of the tree canopy down to groundwater," Kumar said. "The human energy and resource input involved in agriculture production alters the composition of this critical zone, which we were able to convert into a social cost."

Added Richard Yuretich, NSF CZO program director, "using corn as a fuel source seems to be an easy path to renewable energy. However, this research shows that the environmental costs are much greater, and the benefits fewer, than using corn for food."

Where rock meets life: Researchers at NSF's Critical Zone Observatories study Earth's surface.
Credit: NSF

The researchers took several steps to compare the energy efficiency and environmental effects of corn production and processing for food and for biofuel. They inventoried the required resources, then determined the economic and environmental effects of using those resources -- defined in terms of energy available and expended, and normalized to cost in U.S. dollars.

"There are a lot of abstract concepts to contend with when discussing human-induced effects in the critical zone in agricultural areas," Richardson said. "We want to present them in a way that shows the equivalent dollar value of the human energy used in agricultural production, and how much we gain when corn is used as food versus biofuel."

Kumar and Richardson accounted for numerous factors in their analysis, including the energy required to prepare and maintain the landscape for agricultural production for corn and its conversion to biofuel.

The scientists quantified the environmental effects in terms of critical zone services, including impacts on the atmosphere and on water quality, and looked at corn's societal value both as food and fuel.

"One of the key factors lies in the soil," Richardson said. The assessment considered both short-term and long-term soil effects, such as on nutrients and carbon storage.

"We found that most of the environmental effects came from soil nutrients," said Richardson. "Soil's role is often overlooked in this type of assessment, and viewing the landscape as a critical zone forces us to include that."



Contacts and sources:
 Cheryl Dybas, NSF
 Lois Yoksoulian, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

1 comment:

  1. For those people who's relative are Alzheimer’s Disease sufferer and maybe reading this, I find it hard that people are still ignorant of herbal medicine when it comes to treating Alzheimer’s Disease.
    I have been through many phases over the last couple of years since my father's diagnosis, he was 53 years old and had Early Onset Alzheimer’s Disease and his diagnosis changed my life in many ways, I spend most of the time in denial and I keep thinking the tests were wrong. But deep down I knew they were correct. Though sharing his story is very difficult. He was always very successful in being able to accomplish anything he set his mind on doing. Alzheimer’s is a bitch of a disease. It began by robbing his recent memory, but it didn't stop there. It continues to steal, taking the most recent memories until it has pilfered all but the oldest memories, he experienced a decline in his ability to think, remember and make decisions. I feel a need to express my thoughts and feelings about how it affected his day to day living and how its deteriorated since despite the help of some wonderful medics and medicine.
    I remind myself how lucky to come across Charanjit rychtova's herbal medicine which is able to control this disease without any side effect, I felt a moment of relief hoping that he is free from this ailment, and nothing compares to the healing power of nature. Now I believe almost every health problem can be addressed in one natural way or another. The only thing I wanted was for him to feel better. I’m proud to say my Dad is Alzheimer’s free. You can also contact him for more info. at charantova@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete