Sunday, August 18, 2013

New Rechargeable Flow Battery Enables Cheaper, Large-Scale Energy Storage For Wind And Solar Energy

 MIT researchers have engineered a new rechargeable flow battery that doesn't rely on expensive membranes to generate and store electricity. The device, they say, may one day enable cheaper, large-scale energy storage for wind and solar energy applications.

New rechargeable flow battery enables cheaper, large-scale energy storage
Credit:  Felice Frankel

The palm-sized prototype generates three times as much power per square centimeter as other membraneless systems -- a power density that is an order of magnitude higher than that of many lithium-ion batteries and other commercial and experimental energy-storage systems.

The device stores and releases energy in a device that relies on a phenomenon called laminar flow: Two liquids are pumped through a channel, undergoing electrochemical reactions between two electrodes to store or release energy. Under the right conditions, the solutions stream through in parallel, with very little mixing. The flow naturally separates the liquids, without requiring a costly membrane.

The reactants in the battery consist of a liquid bromine solution and hydrogen fuel. The group chose to work with bromine because the chemical is relatively inexpensive and available in large quantities, with more than 243,000 tons produced each year in the United States.

In addition to bromine's low cost and abundance, the chemical reaction between hydrogen and bromine holds great potential for energy storage. But fuel-cell designs based on hydrogen and bromine have largely had mixed results: Hydrobromic acid tends to eat away at a battery's membrane, effectively slowing the energy-storing reaction and reducing the battery's lifetime.

To circumvent these issues, the team landed on a simple solution: Take out the membrane.

"This technology has as much promise as anything else being explored for storage, if not more," says Cullen Buie, an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at MIT. "Contrary to previous opinions that membraneless systems are purely academic, this system could potentially have a large practical impact."

Buie, along with Martin Bazant, a professor of chemical engineering, and William Braff, a graduate student in mechanical engineering, have published their results this week in Nature Communications.

"Here, we have a system where performance is just as good as previous systems, and now we don't have to worry about issues of the membrane," Bazant says. "This is something that can be a quantum leap in energy-storage technology."

Possible boost for solar and wind energy

Low-cost energy storage has the potential to foster widespread use of renewable energy, such as solar and wind power. To date, such energy sources have been unreliable: Winds can be capricious, and cloudless days are never guaranteed. With cheap energy-storage technologies, renewable energy might be stored and then distributed via the electric grid at times of peak power demand.

"Energy storage is the key enabling technology for renewables," Buie says. "Until you can make [energy storage] reliable and affordable, it doesn't matter how cheap and efficient you can make wind and solar, because our grid can't handle the intermittency of those renewable technologies."

By designing a flow battery without a membrane, Buie says the group was able to remove two large barriers to energy storage: cost and performance. Membranes are often the most costly component of a battery, and the most unreliable, as they can corrode with repeated exposure to certain reactants.

Braff built a prototype of a flow battery with a small channel between two electrodes. Through the channel, the group pumped liquid bromine over a graphite cathode and hydrobromic acid under a porous anode. At the same time, the researchers flowed hydrogen gas across the anode. The resulting reactions between hydrogen and bromine produced energy in the form of free electrons that can be discharged or released.

The researchers were also able to reverse the chemical reaction within the channel to capture electrons and store energy -- a first for any membraneless design.

In experiments, Braff and his colleagues operated the flow battery at room temperature over a range of flow rates and reactant concentrations. They found that the battery produced a maximum power density of 0.795 watts of stored energy per square centimeter.

More storage, less cost

In addition to conducting experiments, the researchers drew up a mathematical model to describe the chemical reactions in a hydrogen-bromine system. Their predictions from the model agreed with their experimental results -- an outcome that Bazant sees as promising for the design of future iterations.

"We have a design tool now that gives us confidence that as we try to scale up this system, we can make rational decisions about what the optimal system dimensions should be," Bazant says. "We believe we can break records of power density with more engineering guided by the model."

According to preliminary projections, Braff and his colleagues estimate that the membraneless flow battery may produce energy costing as little as $100 per kilowatt-hour -- a goal that the U.S. Department of Energy has estimated would be economically attractive to utility companies.

"You can do so much to make the grid more efficient if you can get to a cost point like that," Braff says. "Most systems are easily an order of magnitude higher, and no one's ever built anything at that price."
 

Contacts and sources:
Sarah McDonnell
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Written by Jennifer Chu, MIT News Office

5 comments:

  1. My most recent electricity bill, on the grid here in Winnipeg, cost me 9.3 cents per kwh.

    How is $100 per kwh energy going to help?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Because that kW is reusable? (The operative word here is "battery".)

    ReplyDelete
  3. But batteries are now 5-8% of total cost for renewable projects. How could it be $100 per kwh? Should it not be $10 per kwh? That's more reasonable. Maybe, it as just a typo.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Maybe $100 per MWh (10 cents per kWh) ... misplaced decimal point.

    ReplyDelete
  5. In the US in 20115, the average house used 901 kWh per month. 30 per day, roughly. LiIon batteries cost north of $200 per kwh, and break down in heat. They also use lithium, which is toxic and expensive. If these new flow batteries could handle the heat, be more easily extinguishable than LiIon, and give higher energy density, at a cost of $100 per kwh of storage, consider - with more efficient panels, and $6000 worth of battery backing (60kwh), you could easily last through a couple of days of low solar production. In comparison, the 13.5-kilowatt-hour (kWh) Tesla Powerwall 2.0 has a list price of $5,500 (which includes a built-in inverter); this is about $407 per khw. It would cost about $24,000 for similar capacity. Checking quickly on line, 10 KW worth of panels would cost about $38K (installed), adding a new-tech cheaper flow battery would cost another $8K (adding for installation), so $46K for a solar rig that could power your house quite well even in winter, and you'd probably have surplus to sell to the grid in summer. This is not counting fed/state incentives, and would result in a system making twice as much power as a similar cost would have in 2005. And... all this for about 10 to 12 years of electric power cost.

    ReplyDelete